January 26, 2015 13:14 — 1 Comment

Roller Coaster Rides Trigger Stroke in Young Boy

A four-year-old boy suffered a stroke following a day of riding roller coasters at an amusement park, leading to an investigation by Loyola University Medical Center, which was published in the journal Pediatric Neurology. The previously healthy boy began exhibiting nausea and facial paralysis on an airplane the following day, eventually leading to paralysis of the left side. Upon emergency treatment, imaging scans revealed both carotid artery dissection and signs of a stroke. It was concluded that sudden movements of the roller coaster ride hyperextended the neck, dissecting the carotid artery, which led to a mobile blood clot reaching the brain, causing a stroke. “This hypermobility, combined with other kinetic and linear forces experienced during a roller coaster ride, could theoretically explain why some children, albeit rarely, sustain dissections,” explained the author. Upon being treated with low-dose aspirin to relieve the clotting, steady improvement was observed. Six months later, the boy was shown to have improved mobility with only mild weakness on his left side. The researchers noted that 15 percent of strokes occur in adolescents and young adults, despite the common association with the condition as occurring in the elderly. To learn more about this report, click here.

One Comment

  1. Robert E. Harbaugh says:

    This is an excellent example of the “after this, therefore because of this” logical fallacy. It is almost certain that the roller coaster ride was not causally related to the dissection. In August, 2002, the AANS published a white paper on a consensus statement entitled “Fixed Theme Park Rides and Neurological Injuries”. I will be happy to send a copy to anyone who is interested. I can also refer you to a commentary of mine in Neurosurgery (Harbaugh RE: Amusement park injuries and deaths: causation? Neurosurgery Science Times commentary, Neurosurgery 51: #4, 2002). The kind of world class conclusion jumping that is found in this paper is the cause of many unnecessary litigations.

    Report this comment